125k views
0 votes
In "#Ferguson," what do Bonilla and Rosa mean when they say that hashtags have "intertextual potential"?

User Vadimvolk
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

In the article "#Ferguson," Bonilla and Rosa indicate that hashtags have "intertextual potential," meaning that they can connect different texts and foster a network of related ideas. Hashtags help users engage in a larger conversation, accessing various perspectives and contributions on a specific topic.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of the article "#Ferguson," when Bonilla and Rosa mention that hashtags have "intertextual potential," they are referring to the ability of hashtags to connect different texts and create a network of related ideas. Hashtags, when used on social media platforms like allow users to join a larger conversation and link their own posts to the larger discussion. By using hashtags, individuals can access a range of perspectives and contributions on a specific topic.

For example, in the case of the hashtag #Ferguson, users posting about the events and discussions surrounding the Ferguson protests were able to see and engage with a wide variety of opinions, news articles, personal stories, and other types of content. The hashtag functioned as a connective thread that linked different texts together, creating a complex and multifaceted dialogue.

Overall, when Bonilla and Rosa mention the "intertextual potential" of hashtags in the context of "#Ferguson," they are highlighting how hashtags can facilitate the exchange of ideas and create a network of interconnected texts that contribute to a larger conversation.

User Andrey Zausaylov
by
8.7k points