Final answer:
To identify a threat's objectives and desired end state, one must evaluate the individual, state, and global levels of analysis. These interconnected levels provide a comprehensive understanding of the threat's context, magnitude, and potential courses of action.
Step-by-step explanation:
When identifying the Threat's Likely Objectives and Desired Endstate, it's essential to consider multiple levels of analysis to assess the full spectrum of a threat. The individual level of analysis focuses on decision-makers within a state and how the constraints placed by the state impact their actions. The state level addresses the actions of a country and its own set of constraints and objectives. Finally, the global level of analysis looks at how a state's actions influence and are influenced by the international community and organizations.
Any assessment of a threat's objectives and end states must consider all these levels, as they can give insights into the motives, capabilities, and possible actions of the threatening entity. Critical thinking involves understanding how the levels influence each other and how a policy at one level can have ripple effects on the others. Although there is not a set 'subordinate level' to stop at, analysts typically evaluate each level thoroughly to make a well-rounded assessment.