43.8k views
3 votes
Lewis Winford and colleagues reject the description of H. erectus as hunters and argue that the evidence cleary points more accurately to __________.

User Chengmin
by
8.8k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Lewis Winford and colleagues argue that H. erectus was more likely a gatherer and scavenger rather than a hunter, based on evidence of cooking and eating meat, as well as the nature of the fossil skulls at Zhoukoudian, China.

Step-by-step explanation:

Lewis Winford and colleagues reject the description of H. erectus as hunters and argue that the evidence clearly points more accurately to H. erectus as gatherers and scavengers. This is based on the discovery of ancient hearths, charcoal, and charred animal bones in Zhoukoudian, China, which suggest that H. erectus was cooking and eating meat. Additionally, recent research indicates that the fossil skulls once thought to show evidence of cannibalism were actually prey to animal scavengers.

User Kangcor
by
7.7k points