Final answer:
The question outlines a case of sexual discrimination, which is illegal under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. It pertains to the refusal of sexual advances, not pregnancy.
Step-by-step explanation:
The scenario described suggests an instance of sexual discrimination and it violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This act makes it unlawful for an employer, or in this case a landlord, to discriminate against individuals.
With respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, based on factors such as an individual's sex. In this case, the discrimination is based on the tenant's refusal of sexual advances rather than her pregnancy.
Which is also protected under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. Sexual harassment is defined as unwelcome sexual advances or conduct that interferes with an individual’s performance or creates a hostile environment, and is considered a form of sex discrimination.