Final answer:
The evidence for the covenant with Moses, and the broader narrative of the Exodus, primarily comes from the Hebrew Bible, with limited archaeological corroboration. Moses's Egyptian name and mentions of family dynamics provide some historical texture, though precise historicity is challenging to establish.
Step-by-step explanation:
The historicity and evidence of the covenant with Moses, as mainly recorded in the Hebrew Bible, remain subjects of debate among historians and archaeologists. While the Bible suggests a significant exodus led by Moses, archaeological evidence has not fully corroborated these events. However, certain aspects such as the Egyptian origin of Moses's name lend some credibility to the existence of an exodus, albeit likely smaller in scale than described in the scriptures.
Family relationships during the period can be inferred from the Biblical account of Moses's birth, his mother's efforts to save him, and his subsequent adoption by the pharaoh's daughter. This depicts a time where familial bonds and protective instincts led to extraordinary measures to preserve life.
The understanding of Moses's name as Egyptian is plausible considering historical context and scribal practices of the time. While it's not direct proof of the exodus, it aligns with the idea that some individuals or groups may have historical ties to both Egypt and Canaan. Adding to the complexity, the Biblical stories share similarities with earlier Mesopotamian legends, suggesting a blending and adaptation of cultural narratives over time.