Final answer:
Alfred Kroeber's views on works of genius related to those of Darwin are not directly recorded, but Kroeber's cultural anthropology work would offer a different perspective compared to Darwin's biological evolution theories.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question refers to Alfred Kroeber's stance on works of genius, akin to that of naturalist Charles Darwin. Alfred Kroeber, a cultural anthropologist, might not have directly commented on Darwin's works in the same manner as contemporaries like Alfred Russel Wallace did. Wallace, for instance, developed a theory very similar to Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection and directly interacted with Darwin. When discussing genius works in the context of Darwin, it's essential to understand that Darwin and Wallace both made significant scientific contributions to our understanding of evolution. Darwin's theory influenced various fields beyond biology, including social sciences, where concepts like social Darwinism arose—though Darwin himself did not advocate for these interpretations.
While Darwin and Wallace are often cited together for their parallel concepts of natural selection, Kroeber's views on cultural aspects and anthropological work would differ from their biological sciences. His understanding of cultural evolution and the progression of societies would not necessarily align with biological concepts of natural selection but rather with the cultural developments and shifts within human societies.