Final answer:
The study compared the impact of project participation on conservation support and workplace productivity, and also examined the effects of reading medium on comprehension. While not all results were definitive, the research suggested that factors like human interaction and reading on paper might have significant impacts on productivity and learning outcomes respectively.
Step-by-step explanation:
The report vs rapport study sought to identify whether project participation affected community conservation support and productivity in workplace environments. One aspect of the study showed no difference in conservation support between project villages and non-project villages, suggesting that participation had no impact. However, a questionnaire survey reported stronger conservation support in project than in non-project villages, which could have been used to deem the project a success. Another part of the study emphasized the importance of human interaction factors, such as supervisorial style, in relation to productivity over physical factors. In terms of reading comprehension, the study found that students reading on paper performed slightly better than those reading e-books, though no definitive conclusion is drawn from recent meta-analyses. Additionally, studies indicated that despite decreased exposure to violence/trauma and improved physical health, client health was worse than the general public's.