Final answer:
Conservation approaches assuming people are threats to nature focus on reducing human impact to protect biodiversity. Today, there's growing recognition of the positive roles humans can play through sustainable practices and better understanding of socio-economic contexts in environmental interactions.
Step-by-step explanation:
An approach to conservation that assumes people are threatening to nature typically emphasizes the need to control and mitigate human activities to protect biodiversity. Conservationists have often viewed human activity as a predominant threat, focusing on the notion that people are enemies of the environment. Accordingly, conservation strategies have aimed to reduce human impact, sometimes overlooking the roles people play as both conservation agents and users of natural resources. However, it's important to acknowledge that humans can have a positive impact through sustainable practices and stewardship of the environment. Efforts are now being made to provide incentives for sustainable resource use and to consider the socio-economic contexts in which people interact with their ecosystems.
The view of nature as a pristine wilderness separate from human influence, as put forward by figures like John Muir and captured in conservation marketing, is being re-evaluated. Evidence shows that landscapes previously thought of as untouched have often been shaped by indigenous peoples and local communities. Thus, the modern conservation movement is increasingly recognizing the integral connection between humans and natural landscapes, seeking solutions that are inclusive of local and indigenous resource management practices. By understanding human activities and the underlying social causes of environmental degradation, conservation efforts can better promote behaviors that are beneficial to biodiversity.