Final answer:
Naturalism has not rejected science because it emphasizes natural causes and empirical evidence which aligns with the scientific method. It often rejects revealed knowledge, objective morality, and transcendent purpose, preferring explanations based on facts and observable phenomena.
Step-by-step explanation:
The philosophical view known as naturalism has not rejected science. Naturalism emphasizes that everything can be explained in terms of natural causes and laws, with a focus on the observable universe and a reliance on empirical evidence, which aligns well with the scientific method. This standpoint is often contrasted with approaches that rely on supernatural explanations or authoritative divine revelation.
Thus, naturalism typically rejects revealed knowledge (B), objective morality (C), and transcendent purpose (D), as these concepts often suggest a source or a form of existence beyond the natural world, which naturalism does not typically acknowledge. Naturalism holds that any conception of morality or purpose must be derived from natural facts and phenomena, rather than from supernatural sources or an ordained destiny.
In essence, naturalism is a framework that supports a scientific understanding of the world and generally dismisses religious, supernatural, or metaphysical explanations concerning the nature of reality and human existence.