147k views
3 votes
Naturalists believe in limited revealed knowledge.

A) True
B) False

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The statement that naturalists believe in limited revealed knowledge is false, as naturalism relies on the philosophy that knowledge is based on observation and experience, which is always subject to revision. Experiments in science allow for cause-and-effect claims but are not without problems, and a theory does not become a law simply with the passage of time. Nature's understanding through systematic study is incomplete, acknowledging that science cannot answer all questions.

Step-by-step explanation:

Naturalists do not necessarily believe in limited revealed knowledge. Instead, the philosophy of naturalism is grounded in the idea that everything can be explained by natural causes and laws, without the need for supernatural or divine intervention. This philosophy often relies on empiricism, where knowledge is based on experience and observation. In this context, the statement 'Naturalists believe in limited revealed knowledge' is False. Empirical knowledge gained through scientific methods is always open to revision and falsification as new evidence comes to light, and is essentially unlimited and continually expanding.

Experiments in science can indeed make cause-and-effect claims, but they can be problematic due to limitations such as biases, inaccuracies, or ethical considerations. The scientific method itself involves systematic observation, experimentation, and the ability to repeat results, and theories are constantly tested and retested. When two naturalists independently reach the same conclusions from the same evidence, it enhances the credibility of their findings.

The claim that a theory becomes a law when it has been known for a long time is False. Scientific laws are descriptive accounts of how elements of the natural world behave under certain conditions, while theories are broader explanations of natural phenomena. Finally, nature can be understood through systematic study, and sound scientific ideas do withstand the test of time, but science admits its own limitations and does not purport to provide answers to all questions.

User Noah
by
9.5k points