Final answer:
Option B, 'man's value comes from beyond himself,' is NOT a conclusion of the naturalist mosaic of man. Naturalism is more about natural laws and environmental impacts on human value, rather than divine or transcendental sources.
Step-by-step explanation:
Which one is NOT a conclusion of the naturalist mosaic of man? The answer is B. Man's value comes from beyond himself. This option does not align with naturalistic views which are more associated with the understanding that man is a product of nature and his environment, and as such, his value is determined by these factors and his contributions to society. Naturalism espouses that observable natural laws are paramount and should govern society. It contrasts with the view that man's value is given by divine or transcendental sources. Naturalists would argue that a person's intrinsic value comes from their own characteristics and interactions with the environment, not from an external divine source.
The concept of man as a helpless victim is derived from the theory of learned helplessness, which suggests that after experiencing uncontrollable negative events, both animals and humans may resign themselves to the situation. The idea that man can be trained like a dog, similar to conditioning experiments, is also in line with a naturalistic view of human behavior being shaped by environmental factors and experiences. However, the notion that man's value is determined by his production/contribution to society aligns with social Darwinism and pragmatism, reflecting a naturalistic perspective focusing on practical consequences and survival and success within society.