Final answer:
Industries often locate in minority and low-income neighborhoods due to lower costs and less environmental regulation resistance, contributing to environmental degradation and area stigmatization. This targeting is often a result of historical patterns of investment and residential segregation, influenced by postwar migration and discriminatory practices such as red lining.
Step-by-step explanation:
In terms of industry location, industries often target minority and low-income neighborhoods due to the geographic movement of financial capital and the search for areas with a lower cost of operation and less resistance to environmental impacts. Post World War II shifts in investment saw industries and working-class residential corridors develop along significant transportation routes due to the accessible transport and lower property values, but often resulting in environmental degradation. Environmental racism and classism are often implicated when industries are located in areas predominantly inhabited by minorities and economically disadvantaged populations.
Investor trends have led to significant shifts in neighborhood lifecycles. Industrial zones near major transport routes tend to drive away all but the poorest residents, while investment shifts to suburbs have increased neighborhood segregation. Levitt's theory explains how postwar migration and racial intolerance made it difficult for minority families to find housing outside congested ethnic neighborhoods.