Final answer:
Pierre Charles-Dominique's study found that lorises and galago's divided food items by foraging spatially, representing optimal foraging behavior. Similar to human gathering-hunting societies, there's a division of labor, with flexibility in the roles assumed by different individuals, highlighting cooperative strategies in foraging.
Step-by-step explanation:
In his study, Pierre Charles-Dominique found that lorises and galago's divided food items by foraging spatially. This division of foraging areas and food resources is an example of how animal species adapt their feeding behaviors to maximize energy gain and minimize energy expenditure, forming what are known as optimal foraging behaviors. For example, it is understood that certain primates have specialized diets, with some preferring insects, while others may focus more on fruits or gum.
Similarly, in human gathering-hunting societies, there is a division of lab our with respect to food procurement, although this is based on gender rather than species. Men typically hunt for larger game while women gather plant foods and small animals, with some overlap evident in these traditional roles. In present-day foraging societies like the Hadza, while a sexual division of labor exists, the roles are not rigid and can be interchangeable, illustrating the flexibility in such societies.
Just as in the case of the primates studied by Charles-Dominique, humans have also historically relied on the concept of division of labor, with each gender contributing differently but flexibly to the community's overall subsistence strategy. Both cases underline the importance and benefits of cooperative strategies in foraging for both human and non-human primates.