Final answer:
The claim about Susie Gillery Fitz is false, as there is no historical association with the Nuer or 18th-century law. Other exercises confirm the lack of women's legal status prior to the 19th Amendment, Franklin's establishment of the first abolitionist society, the Revolutionary Era's state constitutions excluding women's right to vote, the unpopularity of the colonizationist scheme among black abolitionists, and the birth of Virginia Dare as the first English person in North America.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Susie Gillery Fitz is the woman who challenged the 18th century code Nuer' is False. There is no historical record of Susie Gillery Fitz being associated with the Nuer codes or any challenges to 18th-century law. The Nuer are an ethnic group in South Sudan, and the name Susie Gillery Fitz does not appear to have any relevance to Nuer cultural practices or legal systems.Considering other historical exercises, it is true that prior to the 19th Amendment, women were not recognized as legal persons in their own right. When discussing early abolitionism, Benjamin Franklin did indeed establish the first abolitionist society in America, which is also true. It is true that no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women the right to vote. Additionally, while some black abolitionists supported the colonizationist scheme, generally it was unpopular among them, making that statement false. Finally, Virginia Dare is indeed recognized as the first English person born in North America on Roanoke Island, which is true.