37.0k views
1 vote
Traditional archaeological interpretations of stone tools

A) Favor highly formalized, elaborately retouched, standardized core tools
B) Assume that stone tools were made for mean to hunt with
C) Downplay or ignore the numerous flake tools that are found in sites
D) All of the above

User Adambox
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

Traditional archaeological interpretations of stone tools often focus on standardized core tools for hunting, but over time, there was an evolution towards a diverse use of stone flakes and blade tools, highlighting sophisticated methods and a variety of applications, especially during the Upper Paleolithic and Neolithic periods.

Step-by-step explanation:

Traditional archaeological interpretations of stone tools favor highly formalized, elaborately retouched, standardized core tools, and often assume that stone tools were made predominantly for men to hunt with. This perspective can downplay or ignore the various flake tools found at sites. However, evidence shows that tool-making evolved over time, with the Acheulean tradition being a prime example wherein stone flakes themselves were used as tools, indicating a more diverse usage of stone tools than previously interpreted. Advances in this tradition eventually led to more specialized tools from stone flakes, such as scrapers and engraving tools, emphasizing the complexity and variety of stone tool use.

During the Upper Paleolithic, the blade tool industry emerged, creating more efficient and specialized stone tools, including blade tools which resembled modern knife blades. Finally, the Neolithic period saw further sophistication in stone tool use, with communities employing stones for a variety of tasks, including grinding and cutting, indicative of an advanced, agrarian society.

User Abe Petrillo
by
8.5k points