Final answer:
The statement in question is false because not all societies display equal levels of violence. Human nature's capacity for violence is influenced by a complex interplay of biological and cultural factors, and thus, the levels of violence can significantly vary between societies.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Violence is an aspect of human nature, so all societies display equal levels of violence' is false. Human history is indeed replete with conflict and violence, yet it is not equally distributed across all societies or periods of time. Factors such as the illegal arms trade, drug trafficking, cultural pressures, and the transmission of hatred across generations have contributed to variations in the levels of violence. Large-scale and highly organized violence, or homicide, was noted during the rise of civilizations, such as that seen in Mesopotamia. However, many agricultural communities have lived in peace, proving that organized violence isn't an inevitable outcome of human societies.
It is critical to understand that while humans have the capacity for violence, cultural, societal, and circumstantial influence play a substantial role in determining the manifestation and levels of violence within a society. The tendency towards violence is a complex interplay of biological propensities and cultural influences, with culture acting as a major determinant of whether violence is condoned and glorified, or abhorred and minimalized. This underscores the point that not all societies display equal levels of violence and that human nature does not predetermine a uniform level of violence across all societies.