Final answer:
There is indeed little agreement among scholars concerning approaches to OT to NT Theology, as they diverge on the interpretation of Late Antiquity, the influence of external philosophies and faiths, and the understanding of truth in sacred texts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question revolves around the agreement among scholars concerning methodologies and perspectives in theological studies, specifically in the context of Old Testament (OT) to New Testament (NT) Theology. It posits a statement that there is little consensus among scholars in this area, calling for deeper insights into how scholars differ in their approaches to historical theology and religious texts.
Scholars indeed have varying opinions when it comes to Late Antiquity and the formation of theological thought, often influenced by a multitude of factors including historical context, interpretation of sacred texts, and the influence of philosophical thoughts like those of Plato. Some scholars believe there are connections between Christianity and the Mystery religions, while others like Eduard Meyer refute such influences, accepting only Judaism as a significant precursor to Christian thought. The disparities between scholars' approaches are further complicated when considering the nature of truth within religious texts and the ongoing discussions around orthodoxy and theological interpretations that evolved over time.
When examining the case of Late Antiquity, one finds that scholars diverge in their stances on the uniqueness of that period and the best method to study it, just as they do with OT to NT theology. Issues such as the authenticity and variations in sacred texts, the argument of truth in religious scriptures, and the impact of external philosophies and religions play substantial roles in driving scholarly debate and impeding a unified methodology for studying theological history.