Final answer:
Finch seems to be constrained in their methods of communication and may need to consider more immediate forms of action that are not specified in the excerpts. Political participation is crucial for social change, and reaching out to a nonprofit/interest group or an elected representative could be a proactive alternative.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the provided excerpts, Finch appears to be in a situation where conventional methods of communication are restricted. As they state that they can 'only write two letters a month' and given the sense of urgency and desperation in their plea, it would suggest that the alternative Finch might be considering is a more direct and immediate form of action. While the exact alternative is not specified in the excerpts, we can infer that typical methods such as not showing up for work, writing a letter to opponents, holding a protest, or sending a petition are either not feasible or sufficiently impactful for Finch's circumstances.
Political participation at the group level and individual level is key to active citizenship. Examples of political participation include being part of a political party, taking part in a protest, phoning an elected official, volunteering, or donating money to a cause, as outlined in the references. These forms of participation contribute to social change, as demonstrated by historical acts of protest like the civil rights movement and the boycott of English goods during the Stamp Act controversy.
Reaching out to an interest group or elected representative, as suggested in the 'Call to Action Letter' advice, could be a proactive step for Finch. Nonetheless, given their situation of being in prison, their options are severely limited.