158k views
5 votes
How did Life-Cycle service differ in colonial New England?

a) It was based on voluntary community service.
b) It was compulsory for all citizens.
c) It was limited to specific religious groups.
d) It did not exist in colonial New England.

User Shabbir
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

In colonial New England, Life-Cycle service was closely linked to voluntary community contribution and religious practice, with church membership being key to service in legislative assemblies (option a). A strong work ethic was cultivated among the Puritan communities, supporting a prosperous economy and disciplined workforce.

Step-by-step explanation:

In colonial New England, the Life-Cycle service practice was deeply intertwined with religion and community life. It was not compulsory for all citizens as such; instead, it was based on voluntary community service, and notably, in legislative assemblies, it was church membership rather than land ownership that determined the basis for service.

The Puritans, who were dominant in Massachusetts, expected all members of their community, including young people and children, to work diligently at their callings and contribute to the running of homes, farms, and businesses. This strong work ethic supported a powerful maritime-based economy and served to maintain a disciplined homegrown workforce.

Education was also highly valued, as a working knowledge of Scripture was required for church membership. This emphasis on religious and community life solidified a social structure where service was seen as a reflection of one's faith and commitment to the community.

Hence, the answer is option a.

User Kiruthika
by
8.5k points