Final answer:
The sale of private supplemental insurance is not prohibited in Bismarck countries; these systems allow it but ensure basic healthcare equity. Unlike socialized medicine, universal healthcare systems can be publicly funded but rely on private providers for delivery. The US healthcare system is largely private and aims to balance quality, access, and cost.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that universal healthcare in Bismarck countries prohibits the sale of private supplemental insurance is false. Bismarck systems do emphasize equity in healthcare, ensuring that all individuals have access to healthcare services, regardless of their socio-economic status. However, these systems allow for private supplemental insurance for those who wish to obtain additional benefits beyond the standard coverage. Countries with such systems can provide citizens with basic health needs, often supplemented by organizations such as Doctors Without Borders and the World Health Organization.
In contrast, socialized medicine entails government ownership and management of the healthcare system, which is not the same as universal healthcare. An example of universal healthcare can be seen in Canada, where health services are publicly funded but delivered by private entities, as mandated by the Canada Health Act of 1970. The United States features a primarily private health insurance system, which faces the challenge of balancing quality, access, and cost. The American system provides high quality care and innovations but struggles with cost and equitable access, unlike countries with universal healthcare which tend to have more equal access and lower costs but may face slower service delivery.