61.1k views
4 votes
Compare what utilitarians think about the role of intentions in right action with what Kant thinks about their role.

A) Utilitarians prioritize good intentions and believe that they can justify actions with good consequences. Kant emphasizes that intentions are irrelevant; only the action itself matters.
B) Utilitarians and Kant both prioritize good intentions in determining right action. They both believe that intentions are a crucial factor.
C) Utilitarians and Kant both argue that intentions are irrelevant in determining right action. They focus solely on the consequences of the action.
D) Utilitarians and Kant both consider intentions to be of little importance in determining right action. They primarily focus on the act itself.

User Maheep
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

Utilitarians prioritize good intentions, while Kant believes that intentions are irrelevant in determining right action.

Step-by-step explanation:

Utilitarians prioritize good intentions and believe that they can justify actions with good consequences. On the other hand, Kant emphasizes that intentions are irrelevant; only the action itself matters. So, option A) is correct. Utilitarians focus on the overall happiness that an action brings, and they believe that good intentions lead to good consequences. In contrast, Kant argues that the morality of an action lies in the intent behind it and not in the consequences it produces.

User Atxe
by
9.1k points