Final answer:
The Director considers Unorthodoxy the most heinous crime because it threatens social stability by challenging socially accepted norms, potentially disrupting the uniformity and order. Cognitive dissonance causes discomfort due to inconsistency, and social policies are controversial due to the need to balance rights and liberties. Globalization faces criticism for its environmental impact and political instability.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Director considers Unorthodoxy the most heinous crime because it threatens social stability. Unorthodoxy, in the context of the question, seems to pertain to deviating from socially accepted norms, essentially challenging the status quo. By not conforming, individuals pose a risk to the uniformity and predictability crucial for maintaining order within the society described. In contrast, conformity ensures that individuals do not deviate and that they pursue their goals through means accepted by society. The harm principle also touches on the idea of freedom and how it allows for experimentation, assuming this will enable society to self-regulate through open dialogue, rather than leading directly to dangerous ideas or behaviours.
Celebrities or members of the power elite may commit crimes because they feel their fame protects them from retribution, indicating that they are disconnected from the social consequences due to their elevated status. Such behaviours are examples of innovation in a deviant form, as defined in the context provided, which is pursuing goals through illegitimate means when blocked by societal norms.
Cognitive dissonance is another psychological concept that explains why straying from conformity can cause discomfort. It is because cognitive dissonance disrupts our sense of consistency, leading to psychological discomfort when our beliefs or actions are misaligned.
Focusing on social policies, are controversial often because they require the government to balance the rights and liberties of different groups, reflecting the challenge of creating policies that meet the diverse needs and values of society. Lastly, globalization is criticized for reasons such as having negative impacts on the environment and disrupting political stability, rather than distributing wealth evenly or improving world trade. These critiques underscore the complex interplay between social progress, stability, and individual rights and liberties.