Final answer:
The dilemma between living as an average person today or as a king 2500 years ago revolves around the trade-off between modern conveniences and the power of ancient royalty. The choice is influenced by personal values and perceptions of what constitutes a fulfilling life.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks about personal preference regarding living as an average person in the present or as a king 2500 years ago. This hypothetical scenario is complex because it involves considering various factors like healthcare, lifestyle, knowledge, and personal values. 2500 years ago, a king would have significant power and status, but life was also fraught with dangers such as wars, diseases, and lack of modern conveniences. Today, an average person benefits from technological advancements, better healthcare, and a generally more predictable life. However, they may not have the same level of influence or wealth a king would have possessed.When we relate this to the prophecy concerning Buddha, it was foretold he would become either a holy man or an emperor of India. This suggests that the outcomes of one's life, especially in historical contexts, could vary significantly based on personal choices and societal conditions.In conclusion, the choice between A) an average person in the present or B) a king 2500 years ago largely comes down to individual values and what one considers to be a fulfilling life.