Final answer:
After considering personal comfort, social norms, potential health risks, and societal disapproval, singing in public for money is the safer and more socially acceptable choice (option A) over kissing strangers for money.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question posed is a hypothetical scenario asking whether one would prefer to receive $5 for every song sung in public, or $50 for every stranger kissed. When addressing such a dilemma, it's important to consider various factors such as personal comfort, social norms, public behavior, and potential consequences of the actions mentioned. Opting for the first option, receiving $5 for every song sung in public, could be seen as a way to express oneself artistically while potentially earning money at a lower risk of personal space invasion or societal disapproval. The second option of getting $50 for every stranger you kiss introduces concerns about consent, comfort with physical intimacy, and health risks.
Many would find the idea of kissing a stranger for money uncomfortable or potentially unethical, as it involves personal boundaries and consent issues. On the other hand, singing in public is a widely accepted form of entertainment and personal expression that can bring joy to both the performer and the audience.
Given these considerations, option A—receiving $5 for every song sung in public, seems to be the more socially responsible and personally safe choice. It respects personal boundaries and social norms while offering a way to make money through a pleasant and potentially enjoyable activity. Therefore, in conclusion, the correct option in this scenario would be option A.