157k views
2 votes
You are at an unmarked intersection ... one way is the City of Lies and another way is the City of Truth. Citizens of the City of Lies always lie. Citizens of the City of Truth always tell the truth. A citizen of one of those cities (you don't know which) is at the intersection. What question could you ask to them to find the way to the City of Truth?

A) Is this the way to the City of Truth?
B) Are you from the City of Lies?
C) Do you always tell the truth?
D) Can you lead me to the City of Lies?

User Luanjot
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

D) Can you lead me to the City of Lies? To find the City of Truth, you should ask the citizen at the intersection: 'Can you lead me to the City of Lies?' This works with either a liar or truth-teller, as they would both point to the City of Lies. Philosophical dilemmas and the nature of truth highlight that truth is objective and not relative to opinions or beliefs.

Step-by-step explanation:

Solving the Intersection Dilemma

The scenario at the unmarked intersection between the City of Lies and the City of Truth presents a classic logical puzzle. In order to find the way to the City of Truth, one should ask a question that yields a truthful response regardless of the citizen's origin. After evaluating the options, the best question to ask the citizen is D) Can you lead me to the City of Lies? Here's why:

  • If the citizen is from the City of Truth, they would point towards the City of Lies since they always tell the truth.
  • If the citizen is from the City of Lies, they would also point towards the City of Lies, attempting to deceive, since they always lie.

In either case, the way you are directed would be the way to the City of Lies, so the City of Truth would be the other direction.

Philosophical Considerations

The question also touches upon deeper philosophical dilemmas such as the conflict between two perfect duties: never telling a lie and avoiding harm to others. In instances where telling the truth may cause harm, ethical frameworks such as consequentialism would consider the outcomes of the action, whereas deontological ethics would hold firm to the principle of honesty regardless of the consequences.

Is Truth Relative?

Truth is not a matter of opinion but corresponds to facts and objective reality. As illustrated by the quote regarding dreams, our perceptions can be misleading, but this does not mean that truth itself is relative. The belief that the Earth is flat, for example, is objectively false regardless of personal conviction, highlighting that truth is what aligns with facts and not individual perspectives.

Moral Principles of Citizens and Governments

Philosophers have long debated the moral obligations of both citizens and governments. While moral principles such as the Golden Rule are widely endorsed, discrepancies arise when considering whether lying can be justified in certain situations, such as a government deceiving to protect its citizens. This opens up discussions about the slippery slope of moral exceptions.

Defining 'Truth'

The nature of truth, while complex and often debated within philosophical texts, ultimately adheres to facts rather than opinion. Whether discussing grass blades on the White House lawn or the shape of the Earth, the true answer relates to an objective reality. This remains true even if our access to knowledge is limited or the belief systems within a society differ.

User Sorangy
by
8.3k points