Final answer:
An applicant who misses an exam is typically deemed to have failed, which has historical precedents in situations like voter qualification tests in Mississippi. The practice of subjective assessment has led to discriminatory results. Similarly, rules in various contexts dictate that not meeting necessary conditions results in failure or disqualification.
Step-by-step explanation:
The premise that he or she has failed that examination is based on the assumption that participation on the prescribed date is a requirement to pass. Historically, certain tests, such as those used in Mississippi to screen voters, were subject to subjective measures and could be arbitrarily administered. This type of assessment process often led to discriminatory practices where, for example, black applicants with higher education levels were failed, while illiterate white applicants were passed. In an academic context, missing an exam without official provision for a makeup date often results in a failure by default.
Watching television has been suggested to interfere with exam preparation, potentially resulting in poorer performance. This statement aligns with research findings indicating that increased television watching correlates with lower exam scores.
Throughout history and in various contexts, failure to comply with specified conditions, like being present for a vote or completing assignments, generally leads to negative outcomes, such as being disqualified or failing a class, respectively.