Final answer:
Dan exhibited confirmation bias by only searching for information that supported his preexisting belief about red meat's link to cancer, without considering opposing evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Dan's lack of searching for contrasting evidence while researching the topic of red meat and cancer indicates he was susceptible to confirmation bias.
Confirmation bias is the cognitive tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less consideration to alternate possibilities.
In Dan's case, he focused only on the research that supported his idea that red meat causes cancer and did not look for research that might contradict this view.