Final answer:
In 1985, the LAPD could identify fingerprints to help solve crimes, but the details about Jennifer Thompson pertain to challenges with eyewitness identification, not fingerprint analysis. Her case underscores issues with memory and suggestion during police procedures which led to the wrongful conviction of Ronald Cotton.
Step-by-step explanation:
In 1985, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) had the necessary technology to identify fingerprints from the crime scene which could lead to the identification of a suspect. However, the details provided about Jennifer Thompson's experience in North Carolina highlight the challenges of eyewitness identification, not fingerprint analysis. The student's question seems to be about the techniques available to the LAPD during that time.
While the question mentioned 'print', it did not explicitly specify 'fingerprint', hence there might be some confusion. To clarify, the case of Jennifer Thompson revolves around eyewitness testimony and misidentification where psychological factors and unintentional cues from officers led to the wrongful conviction of Ronald Cotton.