Final answer:
The debate around being born, working, existing, and dying involves philosophical perspectives on objective and subjective realities. Philosophical discussions question the source of objective values and the persistence of identity over time.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering concepts such as objective immortality and subjective immortality, we delve into the realm of philosophical inquiry. The key distinction here is between what is objective—existing independently of personal feelings or opinions—and what is subjective, which is based on personal feelings.
Actions such as being born, working, existing, and dying have objective elements, but our experiences and interpretations of these actions can be deeply subjective. Most existentialists would argue that we can only be sure of our own existence and subjective experiences. Moreover, the argument about objective moral reasoning revolves around the existence of objective values and their purported source.
Philosophers have suggested a variety of sources for moral knowledge, including God, material conditions, and teleology. Others ponder about the persistence of identity given our physical changes over time. Ultimately, these discussions explore whether there is a basis for objective values and, if so, where these values originate.