Final answer:
It is true that journalists often report on controversies without suggesting solutions, and this practice is part of a broader criticism of the media's focus on profit and sensationalism. The proliferation of media platforms has exacerbated these issues by leading to misinformation and polarized content tailored to audience biases. The media must balance factual reporting with analysis, ensuring opinions are identified as such and that coverage is not influenced by vested interests.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is true that scholars and audiences have criticized journalists for predominantly reporting problems and controversies without offering solutions. Indeed, concerns have been raised about the media's pursuit of profits, potential failing to cover government and public affairs in-depth, and not presenting a diverse range of views on policy issues. This criticism stems from various practices in the media industry, including bias by selection of sources, where journalists might include more sources that support one side of an argument, or the use of experts with specific political affiliations to support their narratives.
With the rise of new media platforms, there has been an increased proliferation of media platforms leading to the spread of misinformation. Traditional news outlets are shifting online, and each media channel caters to its audience's preferences, which may lead to a more fractured and polarized public discourse.
The media's role is not only to report news but also to offer analysis and opinion, especially when it comes to complex issues. However, when opinions are presented, it is paramount that they are clearly distinguished from factual reporting. Furthermore, media coverage must be vigilant against the interests of those who might benefit from certain perceptions, as it can lead to the presentation of skewed statistics or over-enthusiastic reports that lack a critical perspective.