Final answer:
Appearance was likely the more important consideration for the Running Fence installation by Christo and Jeanne-Claude, focusing on creating a visual statement and harmony with the environment over cost.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct answer is that appearance was likely the more important consideration when selecting the type of fence for the Running Fence installation.
As an early massive project by artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude, Running Fence was less about functionality and more about creating a visual statement that interacted with the environment, considering it extended nearly forty kilometers to meet the Pacific Ocean.
The material chosen, nylon fabric, along with 2,050 steel poles, was designed to create an impactful visual without leaving a lasting footprint on the landscape, as evidenced by the lack of concrete used and the temporary nature of the installation.
Furthermore, the extensive planning process, including an Environmental Impact Report and collaboration with ranchers, indicates a mindfulness toward the aesthetics of the installment and its harmonization with the surroundings rather than mere cost considerations.
The correct answer is option Appearance. When selecting the type of fence for this installation, the consideration of appearance was more important than cost. This is evident in the description of the Running Fence installation by Christo and Jeanne-Claude.
They worked on the project for 42 months, holding public hearings and writing an extensive Environmental Impact Report. The fence was designed as an artwork and needed to have a visually appealing appearance.