Final answer:
The theme of justification or evidence in literature is extended through logical evidence, such as factual support and expert testimony, and is connected to the overall narrative through thematic symbols and settings. Critical engagement with conflicting evidence and accurately quoting sources add credibility to the analysis. Foundational beliefs and chains of justification offer depth to literary critique.
Step-by-step explanation:
The theme of justification or evidence is extended in a scene through various means such as providing a reason for the topic sentence's claim, using clear illustrations to showcase the point, comprehensively explaining the point, and presenting concrete evidence that underscores the topic sentence's argument. Desmond's use of quantitative evidence is a form of logical evidence that appeals to readers' desire for facts to support an argument. Garrison's approach of connecting textual evidence with the topic sentence and overarching thesis exemplifies how evidence and reasoning support claims within a text. Additionally, the credibility of sources, such as expert testimony, can provide substantial justification and influence the belief in the validity of the presented information. In a narrative, elements like setting or symbols, such as a storm, may serve to elaborate on the significance of the evidence and its connection to the thematic concerns of the story.
When dealing with conflicting evidence, or evidence that appears to counter one's thesis, it is important to engage with it critically. Doing so involves thinking about potential criticisms and how the evidence can still be interpreted to support your stance, thereby reinforcing the validity of your thesis. Throughout literary analysis, accurately quoting representations of events, characters, or other aspects without taking them out of context adds to the credibility of the analysis and shows an intent to meet or challenge conventional expectations in rhetorically effective ways.
Finally, it's integral to assess when a scene, situation, or claim is justifiable, whether through grounding in foundational beliefs or through the overarching chain of justification in the narrative. This self-reflexive questioning enhances the depth of textual analysis and underscores the importance of robust reasoning and evidentiary support in literary critique.