Final answer:
The legal limits of detention of a suspect are defined by the requirement to protect a suspect's rights during arrest and interrogation, as specified in cases such as Miranda v. Arizona, which established Miranda rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The legal limits of detention of a suspect primarily relate to ensuring that the suspect's rights are protected during arrest and questioning. One of the landmark cases that define these limits is Miranda v. Arizona, in which the Supreme Court set out clear procedural safeguards to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. According to the Miranda rights, suspects must be informed of their right to remain silent, the right to be represented by a lawyer, and the right to have counsel provided if they are indigent. The Court declared that prosecutors could not use statements stemming from custodial interrogation unless these rights were effectively communicated to the defendants. Additionally, suspects must be made aware that they have the right to terminate questioning at any time.
Other significant cases impacting the legal limits of detention include Escobedo v. Illinois, which provides the right to counsel while in police custody, and Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, emphasizing the rights of due process for U.S. citizens detained as enemy combatants. The Supreme Court rulings ensure that suspects are not subjected to unconstitutional inquisition and interrogation techniques that psychologically coerce confessions without the necessary legal protections.