Final answer:
The Supreme Court might review a case based on its discretion, focusing on constitutional questions or legal inconsistencies, but the justices do not publicly explain their selection decisions.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is difficult to predict which case or type of case the Supreme Court might review because the justices never explain their reasons for hearing certain cases and not others. The Court operates with a great deal of discretion in selecting cases, typically accepting fewer than 2 percent of the thousands of appeals it is asked to review each year.
Cases are selected based on several criteria, the most significant being the presence of a constitutional question or inconsistent law interpretations across lower courts.The Supreme Court selects cases based on a writ of certiorari, which is a request for judicial review.
The Court typically accepts cases that involve a constitutional question or have differing interpretations of a law. The justices hold a private conference to discuss the cases and make a decision. Four out of the nine justices must agree for a case to be granted certiorari.
The Court primarily uses a writ of certiorari to review cases that come to it on appeal from lower courts like the U.S. Court of Appeals or state supreme courts.
Four of the nine justices must agree to grant certiorari for a case to be heard. This process is done in private, and the considerations are not publicly disclosed, adding to the unpredictable nature of the Court's case selection