Question

A similarity shared by appeals courts and the Supreme Court is that __________.

a. both courts consist of the same number of justices to hear cases
b. cases that are reviewed are not able to present any evidence
c. lawyers addressing the courts can be questioned by the justices at any time
d. rulings are handed down immediately following oral arguments
e. rulings made by both of the courts are final and cannot be appealed

Answer 1

Both appeals courts and the Supreme Court do not allow new evidence to be presented during reviews; their decisions are based on the existing record and legal briefs.

However, not all rulings are final at the appellate level as they can be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Step-by-step explanation:

A similarity shared by appeals courts and the Supreme Court is that cases that are reviewed are not able to present any new evidence.

Both types of courts review cases primarily on the basis of the record and briefs from the lower courts, with a focus on legal arguments and the application of the law. However, it is important to note that while their functions are similar in this respect, there are key differences between appellate courts and the Supreme Court such as the scope of jurisdiction and the types of cases they handle.

Additionally, in terms of decisions, neither appeals courts nor the Supreme Court issue rulings immediately; decisions are deliberated in private conferences before a ruling is handed down. Also, not all rulings made by appeals courts are final, as they can be appealed to the Supreme Court, which has the final say in the judicial process.