Final answer:
The Supreme Court's 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder removed the designation of jurisdictions that needed preclearance to change voting laws, which has negatively impacted African Americans' voting rights. This decision led to the passing of laws in various states that limit voters' rights and access to the polls.
Step-by-step explanation:
In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Shelby County v. Holder that the formula used to determine jurisdictions that needed preclearance to change voting laws was outdated.
The Supreme Court's 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder removed the designation of jurisdictions that needed preclearance to change voting laws, which has negatively impacted African Americans' voting rights. This decision led to the passing of laws in various states that limit voters' rights and access to the polls.
This decision effectively removed the designation of jurisdictions that needed preclearance, preventing the Department of Justice from stopping states and locales from making changes that hurt African Americans' voting rights. As a result, many states, particularly conservative-majority ones, passed laws to limit voters' rights and access to the polls.