Final answer:
The statement refers to traffic law and indicates that certain violations, like speeding, do not require intent. Speeding is based on the objective measure of driving over the posted speed limit, highlighting the difference between de jure (official) and de facto (commonly enforced) speed limits.
Step-by-step explanation:
The scenario described refers to traffic law and the concept of de facto and de jure regulations. The statement "Does not require intent, e.g., exceeding the speed limit" highlights the principle that certain laws, such as traffic laws, can be violated regardless of the driver's intention. Speeding is an offense that does not necessitate intent to be deemed a violation. It is simply based on the act of driving over the posted speed limit. Therefore, it's important to understand that even when no harm is intended, legal responsibility can still be present. Traffic laws are enforced to ensure safety on the roads, and as such, the exceeding of speed limits is regulated to prevent accidents and harm.
Concept of De jure vs. De facto Speed Limits
De jure speed limits are the legal speed limits posted on road signs. However, drivers often perceive de facto speed limits based on the speeds at which they expect to be pulled over by law enforcement. This can often be seen in practice when vehicles speed through intersections, ignoring the official speed limits. A traffic signal installation would enforce the de jure limit by physically impeding vehicles from speeding.