Final answer:
The three kinds of disputes used in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) are empirical disputes, logical disputes, and functional disputes, which focus on evidence, logic, and functionality of beliefs respectively.
Step-by-step explanation:
The three kinds of disputes used in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) are empirical disputes, logical disputes, and functional disputes. REBT was developed by psychologist Albert Ellis and is focused on helping individuals identify and change irrational beliefs that lead to emotional distress.
Empirical disputes involve questioning the evidence behind a belief. Here, the therapist encourages the individual to look for actual evidence that supports their irrational belief.
Logical disputes challenge whether a belief logically follows from the evidence. The goal here is to help the individual see that their thinking may be based on flawed or non-logical reasoning.
Lastly, functional disputes focus on whether a belief is helpful or functional in the individual's life. This type of dispute encourages the individual to consider the consequences of their beliefs and whether they are conducive to achieving their goals.