Final answer:
False, in response cost the removal of a reinforcer does not have to be permanent and can be reinstated to encourage positive behavior.
Step-by-step explanation:
True or false: in response cost, the removal of a reinforcer is always permanent. False. Response cost refers to a behavior modification technique where a reinforcer is taken away to decrease the likelihood of an undesirable behavior. However, this removal doesn't need to be permanent. It can be temporary, and the reinforcer can be returned if the desired behavioral change is observed. For example, continuous reinforcement involves rewarding a behavior every time it occurs, which can fast track learning a new behavior. When the reward is no longer given, extinction may occur, which is the decrease in the conditioned response when the unconditioned stimulus is no longer paired with the conditioned stimulus. Unlike response cost, extinction does not necessarily involve the removal of a reinforcer following a behavior, but rather ceases the reinforcement entirely, which could lead to a reduction or elimination of the behavior. False. In the context of behaviorism and behavioral psychology, response cost involves the removal of a reinforcer contingent upon the occurrence of an undesired behavior. However, the removal of a reinforcer in response cost is not always permanent. Response cost typically involves taking away a specific privilege or reinforcer following the occurrence of an undesired behavior. The goal is to decrease the likelihood of that behavior happening in the future. The removal of the reinforcer can be temporary and contingent upon the behavior improving. If the individual demonstrates the desired behavior, the reinforcer may be gradually reintroduced.