Final answer:
The recent trend in federal court review of presidential power involves the expanded use of judicial review and the increased use of executive powers by modern presidents. The Supreme Court has played a decisive role in shaping the balance of powers, affecting federal and state authority over issues such as health care and immigration.
Step-by-step explanation:
A recent trend in federal court review of presidential power includes the expanded use of judicial review by the courts. This power allows the federal courts to deem state or federal laws unconstitutional if they violate the U.S. Constitution. Historically, the courts have been cautious in exercising this authority.
Nonetheless, the power of the presidency has seen growth, especially during times of war. Modern presidents have increasingly used unilateral powers, such as executive orders and signing statements, to bypass Congress. The Supreme Court’s role has evolved, and its decisions on issues ranging from immigration to health care have been pivotal. Sometimes these decisions have expanded presidential power, and other times they have constrained it.
In terms of recent federal responses and Supreme Court rulings, the Affordable Care Act and the Voting Rights Act illustrate the ongoing debate over the separation of powers.
The increase in executive action, especially in the polarized political climate of the last 40 years, highlights a shift towards a more robust presidential power, often with the Court's oversight. The Supreme Court's decisions on divisions of power, particularly related to federal and state powers over immigration, have also been critical.