Final answer:
Temporary suppression in health refers to reversible contraception methods, while elimination refers to the termination of pregnancy. In historical and political contexts, voter suppression has been used to reduce voter turnout, affecting elections, but practices like literacy tests were eliminated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Step-by-step explanation:
The subject of temporary suppression versus elimination can apply to different contexts, and from the information provided, may concern both health topics, such as contraception and pregnancy, and historical topics, such as voter suppression. In the context of health, temporary suppression is often related to contraceptive methods that are reversible and provide short-term contraception.
These methods prevent pregnancy for as long as they are in use and can be ceased when pregnancy is desired. In contrast, the elimination concerning pregnancy refers to the termination of an existing pregnancy, whether spontaneously—such as a miscarriage—or voluntarily, known as abortion.
On the other hand, in the realm of political history and civil rights, the concept of suppression versus elimination also applies. Voter suppression, as illustrated, aims to reduce the number of voters, affecting the outcome of elections. Forms of suppression have included tactics such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and intimidation.
Thankfully, significant changes like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were enacted to eliminate such practices. However, even today, some argue that laws preventing convicted felons from voting until a state governor reinstates their rights can effectively suppress certain voter classes, hinting at ongoing challenges in this area.