Final answer:
The ability to judge practices is influenced by ethical relativism and the perspective of the evaluator. Some argue for universal standards of human rights that transcend cultural contexts, while others maintain that judgments are subjective and culturally relative.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "We can't judge practices" is a complex one and depends on the perspective one takes. From an ethical relativism viewpoint, judgments about cultural practices must be made in context. However, some argue that certain human rights principles transcend cultural relativism, allowing for the criticism of practices that are harmful or abusive.
When considering the judgment of practices, one can argue that certain fundamental rights should guide our evaluations. For example, if a practice causes harm to individuals or suppresses basic human freedoms, an anthropologist or other observers might feel morally compelled to condemn that practice. This critical standpoint suggests that, while understanding different cultures and practices is important, there can be universal standards of harm and well-being that guide our evaluations.