Final answer:
The ski resort may have the legal defense of assumption of risk. They can argue that the plaintiff voluntarily chose to ski on a slope with well-marked signs indicating the degree of difficulty and assumed the risk of injury. The ski resort may also argue that they fulfilled their duty of care by providing well-marked signs indicating the degree of difficulty.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ski resort may have the legal defense of assumption of risk to avoid liability for the plaintiff's injury. Assumption of risk is a defense that holds individuals responsible for the risks they voluntarily choose to undertake. In this case, the ski resort could argue that the plaintiff voluntarily chose to ski on a slope with well-marked signs indicating the degree of difficulty, and by doing so, assumed the risk of injury.
Additionally, the ski resort may also argue that they fulfilled their duty of care by providing well-marked signs indicating the degree of difficulty on the slope. By clearly indicating the level of difficulty, the ski resort could argue that they provided adequate warning to skiers and fulfilled their duty to inform skiers about the potential risks involved.
It is important to note that the availability and success of this legal defense may depend on specific jurisdiction and the facts of the case. Consulting with a legal professional would be recommended for accurate advice.