74.8k views
2 votes
What evidence refutes the Israelite hypothesis?

A. No DNA evidence connects Native American populations with the Near East
B. references to iron, domesticated crops and animals in the Book of Mormon have not been found in the New World archaeological record
C. All choices are correct
D. there is no linguistic correlation between Native American languages and the languages of the Near Eas

User Tuffwer
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The evidence that refutes the Israelite hypothesis is the absence of DNA connection to the Near East, the lack of archaeological evidence for Book of Mormon references, and the absence of linguistic correlation between Native American languages and the Near East.

Step-by-step explanation:

The evidence that refutes the Israelite hypothesis is C. All choices are correct. There is no DNA evidence connecting Native American populations with the Near East, which contradicts the hypothesis that Native Americans are descendants of the ancient Israelites. Additionally, references to iron, domesticated crops, and animals in the Book of Mormon have not been found in the New World archaeological record. Furthermore, there is no linguistic correlation between Native American languages and the languages of the Near East.

User Sxilderik
by
7.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.