Question

Rosenfeld, Canadian Archivist for the Royal Canadian Astronomical Society, says that there's an 80% chance that the Vinland map is a fake and a 20% chance it's real. This is an appropriate use of statistics because these percentages are based on quantitative (things that you can count) data.

A. True
B. False

Answer 1

Rosenfeld's claim about the Vinland map authenticity percentages is not necessarily based on quantifiable data, making the use of percentages to represent the map's authenticity likely false.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is false that Rosenfeld's statement on the authenticity of the Vinland map is based on quantitative data. The assertion of the map's authenticity being 80% likely to be a fake and 20% likely to be real does not necessarily stem from quantifiable evidence but rather from expert opinion or interpretative analysis. Without concrete quantitative data, such probabilistic statements about historical artifacts like the Vinland map cannot be considered a definitive application of statistics.