Final answer:
Direct democracy has the disadvantage of being impractical because it requires voters to be well-informed, which can be challenging for citizens. As a result, many citizens may skip ballot measures they do not understand.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a direct democracy, the citizens meet to make decisions about laws and public policies. Direct democracy has the disadvantage of being impractical because it requires voters to be well-informed, which can be challenging for citizens. As a result, many citizens may skip ballot measures they do not understand.
However, direct democracy has the disadvantage of being impractical. One of the reasons for this is that it requires voters to be well-informed and make smart decisions.
This can be challenging for citizens who may not have the time or resources to research all the issues before voting. As a result, many citizens may skip ballot measures they do not understand, leading to fewer votes for direct democracy ballot items compared to the choice of a governor.