Final answer:
The false statements are 'a' and 'e', as they incorrectly define what can be considered art based on cultural sophistication and exclude certain creative practices. Art is diverse and cannot be strictly compartmentalized, as it is deeply embedded in the cultural and social context of its creation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The false statements among the options provided are e. Making a commemorative burial pole for someone after they die would not be considered art and a. The boundary between what is "art" and "non-art" can be determined by considering how cultured the society is who produced the object or creation. These statements are false because art cannot be strictly defined by the level of a society's culture, nor can the making of a burial pole be excluded from the definition of art. Art is a representation of human experience and varies greatly across different cultures. The modern understanding of art is not just confined to the aesthetic but also includes historical and economic dimensions. Additionally, artworks are often embedded within a complex set of social relationships and cannot be viewed in isolation. Such a relationship includes the support of patrons in ancient times, which facilitated the livelihood of artists, indicating an intersection of art with societal structure.
The compartmentalization of art as an aesthetically detached experience is often a characteristic of the Western tradition, but many other societies perceive art as intertwined with everyday life, expressed through forms like storytelling and dance. The distinction between 'fine art' and 'craft' has historically been influenced by Eurocentric perspectives, but there is an increasing awareness of the value of all types of artistic production, regardless of the medium or the artists' identity. Art, therefore, is no longer confined to specific definitions or boundaries and is understood in the context of its culture.