Final answer:
True: Procedural justice is the perceived fairness of the processes used to determine the distribution of rewards. It plays a crucial role in organizational behavior as fair processes can mitigate unethical behaviors like stealing. Distributive justice deals with the allocation of resources in society and is shaped by philosophical and practical considerations.
Step-by-step explanation:
True: Procedural justice indeed refers to the perceived fairness of the methods used to determine the distribution of rewards or outcomes. The concept is based on the idea that not only should outcomes be fair, but the processes by which decisions are made should also be just. This perception of fairness in processes can have significant impacts on organizational behavior as evidenced by research experiments, such as the one conducted by Greenberg in 1993, where different levels of explanation were given to students about their pay for a task. Those given less information about the reasoning behind their pay were more likely to 'steal' or take more than they were entitled to.
Distributive justice, on the other hand, relates to the allocation of resources within a society, often guided by principles that aim to ensure the fair distribution of wealth, goods, and services. Discussions of distributive justice include philosophical debates around the concepts proposed by thinkers like John Rawls and Robert Nozick, and practical considerations by governments regarding public and private resources. Concepts such as these are essential to understanding the moral frameworks that govern our social lives.