Final answer:
Walter's conviction can be attributed to various factors, including personal responsibility, systemic issues, and the perception of reality. It's a complex interplay of individual choices and broader societal influences that ultimately contribute to the outcome. Recognizing these different elements is crucial in understanding the intricacies of assigning blame.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding the complexity of Walter's conviction involves examining a variety of factors that contribute to the outcome. It's essential to recognize the role of personal responsibility alongside societal and systemic influences. The references suggest that there are multiple viewpoints and interpretations of reality, which complicate the assignment of blame.
One argument is that individuals contribute to their predicaments through their actions and inactions, challenging the concept of personal responsibility. However, other ideas such as critical race theory imply that there can be systemic oppression that affects legal outcomes, pointing to a need to address institutional biases and social justice. Moreover, philosophical stances like postmodernism question the very nature of reality and truth, which complicates the notion of guilt or innocence and raises awareness of the potential for miscarriages of justice.
Thus, when evaluating who or what is to blame for Walter's conviction, it is necessary to reflect on both personal choices and systemic issues, as well as the pervasive impact of power dynamics and the understanding of reality.