Final answer:
Standards of right and wrong that are grounded in societal norms, mores, and legal norms are not based on personal standards but on established societal or international criteria, including empirical evidence and non-discriminatory practices in international regulations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Standards of right and wrong that are based on concrete or well-founded standards and not on personal beliefs are often reflected in societal norms and laws. Norms include those behaviors within a society that are considered to be normal and expected, and sometimes even legally enforced. For instance, mores are a type of norm that encompasses the moral views and principles of a group, often connected to religious beliefs or deeply-held communal ethics. Violating mores can lead to severe consequences, leading to legal sanctions or social ostracism.
In the context of international norms, such as those governed by the WTO, standards should not discriminate arbitrarily between countries, and they must be empirically grounded in objective, tangible evidence. This means that the regulations set forth by any state must be based on science and should not unjustifiably differentiate between domestic and imported goods or between imports from different countries if identical conditions prevail.
Similarly, norms that are established beyond the personal scope and are consistent with established truths or have useful consequences for those concerned conform to broader societal or international expectations. Hence, standards of right and wrong are not solely a matter of personal belief but must correlate with established and accepted criteria within the society or the international community.